4.6 Article

Multiple retinoic acid response elements cooperate to enhance the inducibility of CYP26A1 gene expression in liver

Journal

GENE
Volume 464, Issue 1-2, Pages 32-43

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.05.004

Keywords

Gene induction; Promoter elements; Liver; Retinoic acid; Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 CA-90214]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CYP26A1, which catalyzes the oxidation of all-trans (at)-retinoic acid (RA), is induced moderately by RA in numerous tissues, but is highly responsive in liver. To understand this difference, we have examined the CYP26A1 gene sequence, identified multiple RA response elements (RAREs) and tested them functionally in HepG2 cells as model hepatocytes, and in the liver of vitamin A (VA)-adequate and -deficient rats. Analysis of a 2.2 kbp S.-flanking region upstream of the CYP26A1 transcription start site (TSS) identified 3 conserved hexameric direct repeat-5 elements, RARE1, -2 and -3, and a half site, RARE4. The full-length promoter containing all 4 elements was sufficient and necessary to increase promoter activity similar to levels of endogenous CYP26A1 mRNA produced in HepG2 cells treated with at-RA. In DNA binding and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, the binding of RARs to the proximal RARE1 and distal RARE2, -3, and -4 regions of the CYP26A1 promoter was increased in RA-treated HepG2 cells, and greater in VA-sufficient than VA-deficient liver. Moreover, RA increased the binding of RNA polymerase-II in the distal as well as the proximal region, indicating that the distal region may be looped to become positioned close to the TSS, a process favored by retinoic acid receptors. The results support a cooperative model in which the functioning of multiple RAREs may account for the strong inducibility of CYP26A1 in liver, which, in turn, may be important physiologically for restoring retinoid homeostasis when the concentration of RA rises. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available