4.6 Article

Embryonic nervous system genes predominate in searches for dinucleotide simple sequence repeats flanked by conserved sequences

Journal

GENE
Volume 429, Issue 1-2, Pages 74-79

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.09.025

Keywords

Highly conserved elements; HCEs; Simple sequence repeats; SSRs; Dinucleotide simple sequence repeats; diSSRs; Microsatellites; Nervous system; Development

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK038955-15] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To study evolution of dinucleotide simple sequence repeats (diSSRs) we searched recently available mammalian genomes for UTR-localized diSSRs with conserved upstream flanking sequences (CFS). There were 252 reported Homo sapiens genes containing the repeats (AC)n, (GT)n, (AG)n or (CT)n in their UTRs including 22 (8.7%) with diSSR-upstream flanking sequences conserved comparing divergent mammalian lineages represented by Homo sapiens and the marsupial, Monodelphis domestica. Of these 22 genes, 19 had known functions including 18 (95%) that proved critical for mammalian nervous systems (Fishers exact test, P<0.0001). The remaining gene, Cd2ap, proved critical for development of kidney podocytes, cells that have multiple similarities to neurons. Gene functions included voltage and chloride channels, synapse-associated proteins, neurotransmitter receptors, axon and dendrite pathfinders, a NeuroD potentiator and other neuronal activities. Repeat length polymorphism was confirmed for 68% of CFS diSSRs even though these repeats were nestled among highly conserved sequences. This finding supports a hypothesis that SSR polymorphism has functional implications. A parallel study was performed on the self-complementary diSSRs (AT)n and (GC)n. When flanked by conserved sequences, the self-complementary diSSR (AT)n was also associated with genes expressed in the developing nervous system. Our findings implicate functional roles for diSSRs in nervous system development. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available