4.6 Review

Food vs. fuel: the use of land for lignocellulosic next generation' energy crops that minimize competition with primary food production

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 1-19

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01111.x

Keywords

bioenergy; biofuels; ecosystem services; energy crops; food; land use

Funding

  1. IBERS through the BBSRC Bioenergy and Biorenewables Institute [BBSEG00003134]
  2. Aberdeen by the EU
  3. Royal Society-Wolfson Research
  4. BBSRC [BBS/E/W/10963A01C, BBS/E/W/00003134A] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. EPSRC [EP/E039995/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/W/10963A01C, BBS/E/W/00003134A] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E039995/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review addresses the main issues concerning anticipated demands for the use of land for food and for bioenergy. It should be possible to meet increasing demands for food using existing and new technologies although this may not be easily or cheaply accomplished. The alleviation of hunger depends on food accessibility as well as food availability. Modern civilizations also require energy. This article presents the vision for bioenergy in terms of four major gains for society: a reduction in C emissions from the substitution of fossil fuels with appropriate energy crops; a significant contribution to energy security by reductions in fossil fuel dependence, for example, to meet government targets; new options that stimulate rural and urban economic development, and reduced dependence of global agriculture on fossil fuels. This vision is likely to be best fulfilled by the use of dedicated perennial bioenergy crops. We outline a number of factors that need to be taken into account in estimating the land area available for bioenergy. In terms of provisioning services, the value of biofuels is estimated at $54.7?$330 bn per year at a crude oil price of $100 per barrel. In terms of regulatory services, the value of carbon emissions saved is estimated at $56?$218 bn at a carbon price of $40 per tonne. Although global government subsidies for biofuels have been estimated at $20 bn (IEA, 2010b), these are dwarfed by subsidies for fossil fuel consumption ($312 bn; IEA, 2010b) and by total agricultural support for food and commodity crops ($383.7 bn in 2009; OECD, 2010).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available