4.7 Article

Prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial evaluating the usefulness of i-SCAN in screening colonoscopy

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages 1011-1021

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.040

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Konkuk University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The newly developed i-SCAN application can theoretically maximize the effectiveness of colonoscopy. However, the practical usefulness of the i-SCAN application during screening colonoscopy has not been assessed. Objective: To assess the efficacy of the i-SCAN application during screening colonoscopy. Design: A prospective, randomized trial that used a modified, back-to-back colonoscopy. Setting: Academic hospital. Patients: This study involved 389 asymptomatic, consecutive, average-risk patients who underwent screening colonoscopy. Intervention: The patients were randomized to the first withdrawal with either conventional high-definition white light (HDWL group; n = 119), i-SCAN contrast/surface enhancement (CE/SE) mode (i-SCAN1 group; n = 115), or i-SCAN CE/SE/tone enhancement-colorectal mode (i-SCAN2 group; n = 118). All patients underwent a second examination with HDWL as the criterion standard. Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome measurement was the adenoma detection rate and adenoma miss rate. The secondary outcome measurement was the accuracy of the histologic prediction of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. Results: The adenoma detection rates during the first withdrawal of HDWL, i-SCAN1, and i-SCAN2 were 31.9%, 36.5%, and 33.1%, respectively (P = 742), and the adenoma miss rates of each group were 22.9%, 19.3%, and 15.9%, respectively (P = .513). Based on the multivariate analysis, the application of i-SCAN was not associated with an improvement in adenoma detection and the prevention of missed polyps. However, the prediction of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colorectal lesions was more precise in the i-SCAN2 group compared with the HDWL group (accuracy 79.3% vs 75.5%, P = .029; sensitivity 86.5% vs 72.6%, P = .020; and specificity 91.4% vs 80.6%, P = .040). Limitations: Single-center trial. Conclusion: i-SCAN during the screening colonoscopy may fail to improve adenoma detection and the prevention of missed,polyps, but i-SCAN appears to be effective for real-time histologic prediction of polyps compared with conventiohal HDWL colonoscopy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01417611.) (Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:1011-21.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available