4.0 Review

Remodeling of Cerebral Microcirculation after Ischemia-Reperfusion

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 22-31

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000381096

Keywords

Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion; Angiogenesis; Vascular remodeling; Endothelial factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical and experimental studies have been focused on the pathophysiological mechanisms induced by brain ischemia-reperfusion injury. Recovery events, such as neurogenesis, angiogenesis and the growth of new blood vessels from the preexisting vascular tree, have been intensively studied in the last decades to clarify the vascular remodeling crucial for stroke outcome. This review aims to discuss the cerebral microcirculation remodeling induced by ischemia-reperfusion and the mechanisms involved in angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. The first in vivo observations were focused on anastomotic shunting of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in experimental and clinical models. Thereafter, vascular remodeling induced by cerebral ischemia-reperfusion was reported in mice and rats. Successively, other studies have assessed that within 30 days of middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion in rats, there is an increase in CBF and recovery from stroke. Recently, rats submitted to transient MCA occlusion showed pial microcirculation remodeling with the formation of new arterioles sprouting from penumbra vessels and overlapping the ischemic core. This review focuses on the production and/or activation of vasculotrophic factors able to trigger and facilitate microvascular remodeling. Vascular endothelial growth factor and endothelium-released nitric oxide appear to be the main factors involved in the formation of new vessels during microvascular remodeling. These studies are fundamental for consequent interventions on molecular targets, useful for fostering vascular remodeling and the recovery of functions. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available