4.7 Article

Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages 71-78

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.050

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Accurate preoperative diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remain difficult. Objective: To evaluate the utility of EUS in the diagnosis and preoperative evaluation of CCA. Design: Observational study of prospectively collected data. Setting: Single tertiary referral hospital in Indianapolis, Indiana. Patients: Consecutive patients with CCA from January 2003 through October 2009. Interventions: EUS and EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA). Main Outcome Measurements: Sensitivity of EUS for the detection of a tumor and prediction of unresectability compared with CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); sensitivity of EUS-FNA to provide tissue diagnosis, by using surgical pathology as a reference standard. Results: A total of 228 patients with biliary strictures undergoing EUS were identified. Of these, Si (mean age 70 years, 45 men) had CCA. Fifty-one patients (63%) had distal and 30 (37%) had proximal CCA. For those with available imaging, tumor detection was superior with EUS compared with triphasic CT (76 of 81 [94%] vs 23 of 75 [30%], respectively; P < .001). MRI identified the tumor in 11 of 26 patients (42%; P = .07 vs EUS). EUS identified CCA in all 51 (100%) distal and 25 (83%) of 30 proximal tumors (P < .01). EUS-FNA (median, 5 passes; range, 1-12 passes) was performed in 74 patients (91%). The overall sensitivity of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of CCA was 73% (95% confidence interval, 62%-82%) and was significantly higher in distal compared with proximal CCA (81% vs 59%, respectively; P = .04). Fifteen tumors were definitely unresectable. EUS correctly identified unresectability in 8 of 15 and correctly identified the 38 of 39 patients with resectable tumors (53% sensitivity and 97% specificity for unresectability). CT and/or MRI failed to detect unresectability in 6 of these 8 patients. Limitation: Single-center study. Conclusion: EUS and EUS-FNA are sensitive for the diagnosis of CCA and very specific in predicting unresectability. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA is significantly higher in distal than in proximal CCA. (Gastrointest Endosc 201173:71-8.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available