4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Endoscopic trimodal imaging versus standard video endoscopy for detection of early Barrett's neoplasia: a multicenter, randomized, crossover study in general practice

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages 195-203

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.014

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Endoscopic trimodal imaging (ETMI) may improve detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Studies with ETMI so far have been performed in tertiary referral settings only. Objective: To compare ETMI with standard video endoscopy (SVE) for the detection of neoplasia in BE patients with an intermediate-risk profile. Design: Multicenter, randomized, crossover study. Setting: Community practice. Patients and Methods: BE patients with confirmed low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) underwent both ETMI and SVE in random order (interval 6-16 weeks). During ETMI BE was inspected with high-resolution endoscopy followed by autofluorescence imaging (AFI). All visible lesions were then inspected with narrow-band imaging. During ETMI and SVE, visible lesions were sampled followed by 4-quadrant random biopsies every 2 cm. Main Outcome Measurements: Overall histological yield of ETMI and SVE and targeted histological yield of ETMI and SVE. Results: A total of 99 patients (79 men, 63 10 years) underwent both procedures. ETMI had a significantly higher targeted histological yield because of additional detection of 22 lesions with LGIN/high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (EIGIN)/carcinoma (Ca) by AFT. There was no significant difference in the overall histological yield (targeted + random) between ETMI and SVE. HGIN/Ca was diagnosed only by random biopsies in 6 of 24 patients and 7 of 24 patients, with ETMI and SVE, respectively. Limitations: Inspection, with high-resolution endoscopy and AFT, was performed sequentially. Conclusion: ETMI performed in a community-based setting did not improve the overall detection of dysplasia compared with SVE. The diagnosis of dysplasia is still being made in a significant number of patients by random biopsies. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of LGIN have a significant risk of HGIN/Ca. (Clinical trial registration number: ISRCTN91816824; NTR867.) (Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:195-203.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available