4.7 Article

Endoscopic closure of GI fistulae by using an over-the-scope clip

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages 1289-1296

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.033

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Preclinical studies have demonstrated the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) to be feasible and safe for closure of gastric, duodenal, and colonic perforations. A retrospective clinical study demonstrated the feasibility and preliminary safety of the OTC for the treatment of GI bleeding and closure of acute GI perforations. Objective: Because the OTSC allows rapid and easy endoscopic organ wall closure, we hypothesized that it might be a useful tool to close GI fistulae. Design: Case series. Setting: Academic medical center. Patients: Four consecutive patients with GI fistulae. Interventions: In all patients, a 12-mm OTSC, in combination with the dedicated twin grasper, anchor device, or endoscopic suction, was used to facilitate endoscopic closure. Main Outcome Measurements: In 2 cases, OTSCs allowed complete closure of a posttraumatic esophagopulmonary fistula and a chronic gastrocutaneous fistula. Leak tests and follow-up examination demonstrated complete leakproof closures. In 1 esophagopulmonary fistula and 1 jejunocutaneous fistula, the initial closure attempts using OTSCs were not successful because of chronic fibrotic changes and scarring at the fistula site. Both OTSCs were removed by using an endoscopic grasping forceps. The mean procedure time was 54 minutes (range 24-93 minutes). There were no procedure-related complications. Limitations: Small sample size. Conclusions: The OTSC seems to be a feasible device to close chronic fistulae of the GI tract. It can achieve leakproof, full-thickness closure of transmural defects. Nevertheless, in circumstances of severe fibrosis and scarring, complete incorporation of the defect into the applicator cap and successful OTSC application might not be possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available