4.7 Review

Minimizing occupational hazards in endoscopy: personal protective equipment, radiation safety, and ergonomics

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 227-235

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.071

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, by using a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the related articles feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and avert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through August 2009 for articles related to personal protection equipment by using the key words personal protection equipment (exp Protective Clothing/ or exp Protective Devices/ or exp Masks/ or exp Occupational Exposure) infection control paired with Endoscopy. For the radiation section, the following key words were used: radiation and endoscopy, radiation and ERCP, and radiation safety. For the ergonomics section, the following key words were used: ergonomics of endoscopy, endoscopist injury, Medical ergonomics, endoscopy and musculoskeletal strain, musculoskeletal injury and endoscopists, occupational diseases and endoscopy, cumulative trauma disorder and endoscopy, repetitive strain injury and endoscopy. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available