4.7 Article

Small-bowel lesions caused by portal hypertension of schistosomal origin: a capsule endoscopy pilot study

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages 861-866

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.014

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Schistosomiasis is a highly prevalent disease. It can evolve to its hepatosplenic form in up to 10% of the cases. The small-bowel lesions developed during the hepatosplenic stage of the disease have not been described in vivo. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe, for the first time, in a pilot study, the endoscopic aspects of the lesions in the small bowel of patients with portal hypertension clue to schistosomiasis, using the PillCam SB. and to determine the usefulness of the method for the diagnosis of esophageal varices. Design: Case series. Setting: Tertiary-care medical center. Patients: Nine nonrandomized patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis and esophageal varices without previous 01 bleeding were selected based on findings from the PillCam SB. Patients using medications that could alter the coagulation, with history of abdominal surgery, who were undergoing treatment or the portal hypertension other than beta-blocker, and with symptoms suggesting bowel obstruction were excluded. The findings were interpreted by a single endoscopist. Results. Capsule endoscopy was able to diagnose esophageal varices in all 9 patients. All of the patients presented angioectasias and venectasias in the small bowel. Small-bowel varices were present in 22.2% of the patients; edema and erosions were found in 66.7% and 88.9%, respectively. Lesions of so-called scarred mucosa were found in 55.5% of the patients. Limitations: Small number of patients; case series Conclusion: The PillCam SB was effective, giving a significant contribution to the description of the esophageal varices and small-bowel lesions of the patients with portal hypertension Caused by Schistosoma mansoni.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available