4.7 Article

A self-expanding metal stent for complicated variceal hemorrhage: experience at a single center

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 71-78

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.07.028

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Refractory variceal bleeding is associated with a high mortality Existing salvage techniques such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and balloon tamponade (BT) have important limitations and may not be appropriate for all patients. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel removable self-expanding metal stent in the management of refractory variceal bleeding. Design: Case series. Setting: Tertiary referral liver center. Patients: Ten patients with variceal hemorrhage with contrainclications to TIPS insertion or BT Interventions: Insertion of a self-expanding metal stent (SX-Ella DANIS Stent). Main Outcome Measures: Survival, failure to control bleeding, and complications. Results: Stent insertion was successful in 9 Of 10 patients. Failure to Control bleeding was observed in 3 patients (2 with gastric varices), with control of bleeding in the remainder. Overall survival at 42 clays was 50%. Six patients survived the acute bleeding episode and had stents removed endoscopically at a median of 9 clays after insertion. One patient had a minor Ulceration Of the esophagus caused by stent insertion. Conclusions: insertion of the SX-Ella DANIS stent in patients with refractory variceal bleeding or complications Of previous therapy is effective for the control of bleeding. Stent insertion can be achieved in the majority of patients without fluoroscopic control and without Major complications. in selected patients, SX-Ella DANIS stent insertion offers an alternative to other methods Of salvage such as BT and TIPS and could be considered 21 substitute for BT after a prospective trial. (Gastrointest Endose 2010;71:71-8.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available