4.8 Article

Therapeutic Liver Reconstitution With Murine Cells Isolated Long After Death

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 139, Issue 3, Pages 1019-1029

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.05.082

Keywords

Fumarylacetoacetate Hydrolase (Fah)-Deficient Mice; Hereditary Tyrosinemia Type I; Liver Disease; Hepatocytes

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 DK051592, RR00163]
  2. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
  3. American Liver Foundation
  4. American Society of Transplantation
  5. NIDDK Core Lab of the Texas Gulf Coast Digestive Diseases Center [DK 56338]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Due to the shortage of donor organs, many patients needing liver transplantation cannot receive one. For some liver diseases, hepatocyte transplantation could be a viable alternative, but donor cells currently are procured from the same sources as whole organs, and thus the supply is severely limited. METHODS: Here, we investigated the possibility of isolating viable hepatocytes for liver cell therapy from the plentiful source of morgue cadavers. To determine the utility of this approach, cells were isolated from the livers of non-heart-beating cadaveric mice long after death and transplanted into fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase-deficient mice, a model for the human metabolic liver disease hereditary tyrosinemia type I and a stringent in vivo model for hepatic cell transplantation. RESULTS: Surprisingly, complete and therapeutic liver repopulation could be achieved with hepatocytes derived up to 27 hours post mortem. CONCLUSIONS: Competitive repopulation experiments showed that cadaveric liver cells had a repopulation capacity similar to freshly isolated hepatocytes. Importantly, viable hepatocytes also could be isolated from cadaveric primate liver (monkey and human) efficiently. These data provide evidence that non-heart-beating donors could be a suitable source of hepatocytes for much longer time periods than previously thought possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available