4.8 Article

Validation and extension of the PREMM1,2 model in a population- based cohort of colorectal cancer patients

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages 39-46

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.10.042

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K24 CA113433-01, K24 CA113433-02, K24 CA113433-03, CA 113433, K24 CA113433] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K24CA113433] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: Early recognition of patients at risk for Lynch syndrome is critical but often difficult. Recently, a predictive algorithm-the PREMM1,2 model-has been developed to quantify the risk of carrying a germline mutation in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1 and MSH2. However, the model's performance in an unselected, population-based colorectal cancer population as well as its performance in combination with tumor MMR testing are unknown. Methods: We included all colorectal cancer cases from the EPICOLON study, a prospective, multicenter, population-based cohort (n = 1222). All patients underwent tumor microsatellite instability analysis and immunostaining for MLH1 and MSH2, and those with MMR deficiency (n = 91) underwent tumor BRAF V600E mutation analysis and MLH1/MSH2 germline testing. Results: The PREMM1,2 model with a 5% cut-off had a sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, 68%, and 2%, respectively. The use of a higher PREMM1,2 cut-off provided a higher specificity and PPV, at expense of a lower sensitivity. The combination of a :5% cut-off with tumor MMR testing maintained 100% sensitivity with an increased specificity (97%) and PPV (21%). The PPV of a PREMM1,2 score >= 20% alone (16%) approached the PPV obtained with PREMM1,2 score :5% combined with tumor MMR testing. In addition, a PREMM1,2 score of <5% was associated with a high likelihood of a BRAF V600E mutation. Conclusions: The PREMM1,2 model is useful to identify MLH1/MSH2 mutation carriers among unselected colorectal cancer patients. Quantitative assessment of the genetic risk might be useful to decide on subsequent tumor MMR and germline testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available