4.8 Article

The bone morphogenetic protein pathway is inactivated in the majority of sporadic colorectal cancers

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages 1332-1341

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.059

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: The finding of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptor la mutations in juvenile polyposis suggests that BMPs are important in colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the BMP pathway in sporadic CRC. Methods: We investigated BMP receptor (BMPR) expression using immuno-blotting and sequenced BMPR2 in CRC cell lines. We assessed the expression of BMPRs, SMAD4, and pSMAD1/5/8 in 72 sporadic CRCs using a tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry. We assessed the effect of reintroduction of wild-type BMPR2 on BMP pathway activity and the effect of wild-type or mutated BMPR2 3' untranslated region (UTR) sequences on protein expression by attachment to pCMV-Luc. Results: BMPR2 and SMAD4 protein expression is abrogated in microsatellite unstable (MSI) and microsatellite stable (MSS) cell lines, respectively. BMPR2 3'UTR is mutated in all MSI and in none of the MSS cell lines. Mutant BMPR2 3'UTR sequences reduced luciferase expression 10-fold compared with wild-type BMPR2 3'UTR. BMPR2 expression is impaired more frequently in MSI CRCs than MSS (85% vs 29%; P < .0001) and shows a mutually exclusive pattern of impaired expression compared with SMAD4. Nine of 11 MSI cancers with impaired expression of BMPR2 have microsatellite mutations. The BMP pathway is inactivated, as judged by nuclear pSMAD1/5/8 expression, in 70% of CRCs, and this correlates with BMPR and SMAD4 loss. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the BMP pathway is inactivated in the majority of sporadic CRCs. In MSI CRC this is associated predominantly,with impaired BMPR2 expression and in MSS CRC with impaired SMAD4 expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available