4.5 Article

Crouch gait in persons with positive sagittal spine alignment resolves with surgery

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 372-377

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.012

Keywords

Spinal deformity; Positive sagittal alignment; Reconstruction surgery; Gait analysis; Crouch gait

Funding

  1. Medtronic Sofamer-Danek Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Degenerative spinal conditions often result in positive sagittal alignment which may be corrected using multi-segment spinal reconstructive surgeries. The purpose of this study was to investigate gait kinematics before and after spinal reconstructive surgery in persons with positive sagittal alignment. Methods: Subjects presenting with positive sagittal alignment of greater than or equal to 7 cm who were treated with spinal reconstructive surgery were included in this study. Gait analyses were conducted pre- and 6 months post-operatively. Data were collected while subjects stood quietly for 20 s and walked at their normal self-selected walking speed. Results: For 12 subjects, sagittal spine alignment during standing and walking was significantly decreased post-operatively (p < 0.0001 for standing and p < 0.0005 for walking). Prior to surgery, the subjects appeared to adopt a crouch gait with the knee flexion angle at mid terminal stance decreasing significantly after surgery (p < 0.0 for the dominant lower limb and p < 0.0 for the non-dominant lower limb). Additionally, dominant step length (p < 0.003) and non-dominant step length (p < 0.001) increased significantly after surgery. Conclusions: Positive sagittal alignment resulted in crouch gait, which was resolved after multi-segment reconstructive spinal surgery that improved sagittal spinal alignment. Step and stride lengths also improved after surgical correction of the sagittal alignment. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available