4.5 Article

Adaptation to walking with an exoskeleton that assists ankle extension

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 495-499

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.029

Keywords

Walking; Exoskeleton; Bio-robotics; Adaptation; Metabolic cost

Funding

  1. M2Ocean Lab of the University of Antwerp [AUHA/006/009]
  2. [BOF10/DOC/288]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this study was to investigate adaptation to walking with bilateral ankle-foot exoskeletons with kinematic control that assisted ankle extension during push-off. We hypothesized that subjects would show a neuromotor and metabolic adaptation during a 24 min walking trial with a powered exoskeleton. Nine female subjects walked on a treadmill at 1.36 +/- 0.04 ms(-1) during 24 min with a powered exoskeleton and 4 min with an unpowered exoskeleton. Subjects showed a metabolic adaptation after 18.5 +/- 5.0 min, followed by an adapted period. Metabolic cost, electromyography and kinematics were compared between the unpowered condition, the beginning of the adaptation and the adapted period. In the beginning of the adaptation (4 min), a reduction in metabolic cost of 9% was found compared to the unpowered condition. This reduction was accompanied by reduced muscular activity in the plantarflexor muscles, as the powered exoskeleton delivered part of the necessary ankle extension moment. During the adaptation this metabolic reduction further increased to 16%, notwithstanding a constant exoskeleton assistance. This increased reduction is the result of a neuromotor adaptation in which subjects adapt to walking with the exoskeleton, thereby reducing muscular activity in all leg muscles. Because of the fast adaptation and the significant reductions in metabolic cost we want to highlight the potential of an ankle-foot exoskeleton with kinematic control that assists ankle extension during push-off. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available