4.5 Article

Voluntarily changing step length or step width affects dynamic stability of human walking

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 472-477

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.010

Keywords

Dynamic stability; Walking; Step width; Step length

Funding

  1. American Society of Biomechanics Student
  2. National Institutes of Health [1-R21-EB007638-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in step width (SW), step length (SL), and/or the variability of these parameters have been prospectively related to risk of falling. However, it is unknown how voluntary changes in SW and SL directly alter variability and/or dynamic stability of walking. Here, we quantified how variability and dynamic stability of human walking changed when individuals voluntarily manipulated SW and SL 14 unimpaired, young adults walked on a treadmill at their preferred walking speed with normal gait, with a metronome and with narrower, wider, shorter and longer steps than normal. Taking narrower steps caused increased SL variability while mediolateral (ML) movements of the C7 vertebra (i.e., trunk) became locally more stable (p < 0.05) and anterior-posterior (AP) C7 movements became locally less stable (p < 0.05). Taking wider steps caused increased SW and SL variability, while ML C7 movements became both locally and orbitally less stable (p < 0.05). Any change in SL caused increased SW, SL, and stride time variability. When taking shorter steps, ML C7 movements exhibited greater short-term local and orbital instability, while AP C7 movements exhibited decreased short-term and long-term local instability (p < 0.05). When taking longer steps, AP, ML and vertical C7 movements all exhibited increased long-term local instability and increased orbital instability (p < 0.05). Correlations between mean SW, SL and dynamic stability of C7 marker motions were weak. However, short-term voluntary changes in SW and SL did significantly alter local and orbital stability of trunk motions. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available