4.5 Article

Both coordination and symmetry of arm swing are reduced in Parkinson's disease

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 373-377

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.10.180

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; Arm swing asymmetry; Maximum cross correlation; Relative phase; Synchronization; Gait; Accelerometers

Funding

  1. [NS060722]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: A recent study reporting significantly reduced symmetry in arm swing amplitude in early Parkinson's disease (PD), as measured during single strides in a gait laboratory, led to this investigation of arm swing symmetry and coordination over many strides using wearable accelerometers in PD. Methods: Forearm accelerations were recorded while eight early PD subjects and eight Controls performed 8-min walking trials. Arm swing asymmetry (ASA), maximal cross-correlation (MXC), and instantaneous relative phase (IRP) of bilateral arm swing were compared between PD and Controls. Correlations between arm swing measurements (ASA and MXC) and Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores were estimated. Results: PD subjects demonstrated significantly higher ASA (p = 0.002) and lower MXC (p < 0.001) than Controls. The IRP probability distribution for PD was significantly different than Controls (p < 0.001), with an angular standard deviation of 67.2 degrees for PD and 50.6 degrees for Controls. Among PD subjects, ASA was significantly correlated with the UPDRS score for the limbs (R-2 = 0.58, p = 0.049), whereas MXC was significantly correlated with the tremor subscore of the limbs (R-2 = 0.64, p = 0.031). Discussion: The study confirms previously reported higher arm swing asymmetry in PD but also shows there is significantly lower MXC and greater IRP variability, suggesting that reduction in bilateral arm coordination may contribute to clinically observed asymmetry in PD. The differential correlation of clinical measures of motor disability with measurements of arm swing during gait is intriguing and deserves further investigation. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available