4.5 Article

Effects of biofeedback on secondary-task response time and postural stability in older adults

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 523-528

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.10.359

Keywords

Cognitive load; Response time; Vibrotactile feedback; Balance; Older adult

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation's CAREER under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act [RAPD-0846471]
  2. National Institute on Aging Michigan Claude Pepper Older Americans Independence Center [AG08808, AG024824]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Real-time single- and multiple-axis vibrotactile feedback of trunk motion has been shown to significantly decrease mean trunk tilt and decrease time spent outside a no vibrotactile feedback zone (dead zone) in older adults within a laboratory setting. This study aimed to determine if these improvements can translate into everyday use, during which other tasks may simultaneously demand attention. A dual-task paradigm was used in which 10 community-dwelling older adults were asked to perform standing trials in the presence of a secondary task (verbal or push-button), vibrotactile feedback, or both (dual-task). Results show that subjects significantly increased the percentage of time inside the dead zone when feedback was provided compared to when it was not during both verbal (+13.6%) and push-button (+10.1%) secondary tasks. Providing feedback also decreased RMS of trunk tilt during both secondary tasks (verbal: -0.129 degrees; push-button: -0.138 degrees). However, response times for secondary tasks increased (verbal: +119 ms; push-button: +110 ms) when feedback was provided. These results suggest that while vibrotactile feedback does increase attentional load in older adults, it can still be used effectively to improve postural metrics in high cognitive load situations. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available