4.5 Article

Contribution of calcaneal and leg segment rotations to ankle joint dorsiflexion in a weight-bearing task

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 85-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.01.007

Keywords

Foot; Squat; Motion analysis; Kinematics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Joint angle is the relative rotation between two segments where one is a reference and assumed to be non-moving. However, rotation of the reference segment will influence the system's spatial orientation and joint angle. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the contribution of leg and calcaneal rotations to ankle rotation in a weight-bearing task. Forty-eight individuals performed partial squats recorded using a 3D motion capture system. Markers on the calcaneus and leg were used to model leg and calcaneal segment, and ankle joint rotations. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the contribution of leg and calcaneal segment rotations to ankle joint dorsiflexion. Regression models for left (R-2 = 0.97) and right (R-2 = 0.97) ankle dorsiflexion were significant. Sagittal plane leg rotation had a positive influence (left: beta = 1.411; right: beta = 1.418) while sagittal plane calcaneal rotation had a negative influence (left: beta = -0.573; right: beta = -0.650) on ankle dorsiflexion. Sagittal plane rotations of the leg and calcaneus were positively correlated (left: r = 0.84, P < 0.001; right: r = 0.80, P < 0.001). During a partial squat, the calcaneus rotates forward. Simultaneous forward calcaneal rotation with ankle dorsiflexion reduces total ankle dorsiflexion angle. Rearfoot posture is reoriented during a partial squat, allowing greater leg rotation in the sagittal plane. Segment rotations may provide greater insight into movement mechanics that cannot be explained via joint rotations alone. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available