4.5 Article

Meaningful change in measures of gait variability in older adults

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 175-179

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.002

Keywords

Gait speed; Gait variability; Meaningful change; Aging

Funding

  1. National Institutes on Aging [AG03949, R01 AG025119]
  2. University of Pittsburgh Older American's Independence Center [P30 AG024827-01]
  3. American Federation of Aging Research Paul Beeson Career Development Award [K23 AG026766]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Gait variability is an important indicator of impaired mobility in older adults; however, little is known about the meaning of change in gait variability over time. This study estimated clinically meaningful change in measures of gait variability using both distribution-and anchor-based approaches. Design: Community-based observational cohort study. Setting: Bronx County and the research center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Participants: Of 1148 participants in the Einstein Aging Study, 241 had quantitative gait assessments in two consecutive years between 2001 and 2005. Measurements: Gait variables were collected using a 12-foot instrumented walkway as participants walked at their normal walking speed. Gait variability was defined as the within-person standard deviation (SD) across steps in two 12-foot walks. Distribution-based meaningful change estimates used Cohen's effect size (0.2 for small and 0.5 for moderate effects). Anchor-based estimates were obtained using dichotomous and ordinal self-reported walking ability ratings as anchors. Results: Distribution-based estimates for small and substantial changes of variability measures were: stance time 0.005 and 0.014 s; swing time 0.003 and 0.009 s; step length 0.24 and 0.61 cm; and step width 0.03 and 0.08 cm. Among those reporting no change in walking ability, measures of gait variability were stable over 1 year. Among those reporting a decline in walking, stance time and swing time variability increased. Among those reporting an improvement in walking, only step length variability improved. Conclusion: Preliminary criteria for meaningful change are 0.01 s for stance time and swing time variability and 0.25 cm for step length variability. These estimates may identify important changes over time in both clinical settings and research studies. (C) 2009 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available