4.5 Article

Postural control in women with multiple sclerosis Effects of task, vision and symptomatic fatigue

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 608-614

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.09.002

Keywords

Control of balance; Time to contact; Stability boundary; Movement disorders; Sensory loss

Funding

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [PP0934, RG 3974A2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) often report problems with balance which may be most apparent during challenging postural tasks such as leaning or reaching and when relying on non-visual sensory systems An additional obstacle facing people with MS is a high incidence of symptomatic fatigue (>70%) The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in balance during upright stance in individuals with mild-to-moderate disability due to MS under normal and restricted vision and different levels of self-reported fatigue Limb loading asymmetry sway and magnitude of postural shift in center of pressure and time-to-contact the stability boundary of the center of mass and center of pressure were assessed during quiet standing and maximal lean and reach tasks Compared to controls people with MS displayed greater postural sway greater loading asymmetry and shorter time-to-contact during quiet standing In the postural perturbation tasks the MS group had smaller postural shifts and reduced stability compared to controls in the direction perpendicular to the lean and reach Limiting vision increased loading asymmetry during quiet standing and postural instability during backward lean in the MS group Inducing additional fatigue in the MS group did affect postural control in the more challenging balance conditions but had no impact during quiet upright standing The results of this study indicate subtle changes in postural control during standing in people with mild-to-moderate impairments due to MS (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available