4.5 Article

Rapid gait termination: Effects of age, walking surfaces and footwear characteristics

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 65-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.03.003

Keywords

Balance; Footwear; Gait termination; Aged; Surfaces; Gait

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [433049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the influence Of Various walking surfaces and footwear characteristics oil the ability to terminate gait rapidly in 10 Young and 26 older people. subjects walked at a self-selected speed in eight randomized shoe conditions (standard versus elevated heel, soft sole, hard sole, high-collar, flared sole, bevelled heel and tread sole) on three surfaces: Control, irregular and wet. In response to all audible cue, Subjects were required to Stop as quickly as possible in three out of eight walking trials in each condition. Time to last foot contact, total stopping time, stopping distance, number of steps to stop, step length and step width post-cue and base of support length at total stop were calculated from kinematic data collected Using two CODA scanner Units. The older subjects took more time and a longer distance to last foot contact and were more frequently classified as using a three or more-steps stopping strategy compared to the Young subjects. The wet surface impeded gait termination, as indicated by greater total stopping time and stopping distance. Subjects required more time to terminate gait in the soft sole shoes compared to the standard shoes. In contrast, the high-collar shoes reduced total stopping time oil the wet surface. These findings Suggest that older adults have more difficulty terminating gait rapidly than then, younger counterparts and that footwear is likely to influence whole-body stability during challenging postural tasks on wet surfaces. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available