4.5 Article

Effect of treadmill walking on the stride interval dynamics of human gait

Journal

GAIT & POSTURE
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 431-435

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.06.017

Keywords

Treadmill; Handrail; Overground; Detrended fluctuation analysis; Gait; Stride interval; Stride dynamics

Funding

  1. Bloorview Children's Hospital Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metronomic walking has been found to diminish the statistical persistence intrinsic to the stride interval time series of human gait. Since treadmill walking (TW) possesses a similar form of external pacing, we proposed to study the disruptions in the natural neuromuscular rhythms of gait during TW. Treadmill walking is a widespread rehabilitative tool, however, its effect oil an individual's stride dynamics is not well understood. To better elucidate potential effects, we tested the hypothesis that TW without handrails would diminish the statistical persistence in an individual's stride interval time series. The scaling exponent (a) was employed in this study as a measure of the statistical persistence of the stride interval time series. Sixteen able-bodied young adults (mean age: 23.3 +/- 3.3 years) were instructed to walk at a self-selected comfortable pace for 15 min in three different conditions in a randomized order: (7) overground walking, (2) TW without holding a handrail (NoRail) and (3) TW while holding a front handrail (Rail). The a did not differ significantly between the overground and NoRail conditions (P > 0.5). However, the a of the Rail condition (alpha = 0.92 +/- 0.10) differed significantly front both the overground (alpha = 0.83 +/- 0.06; P < 0.015) and NoRail conditions (alpha = 0.82 +/- 0.08; P < 0.01). In contrast, stride interval variability did not change between walking conditions (P > 0.5). These findings indicate that comfortable-paced TW does not diminish the intrinsic stride dynamics of human gait. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available