4.4 Review

Postradiation imaging changes in the CNS: how can we differentiate between treatment effect and disease progression?

Journal

FUTURE ONCOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 1277-1297

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/fon.13.271

Keywords

pseudoprogression; radiation treatment effect; radionecrosis; radiosurgery

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA006973] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A familiar challenge for neuroradiologists and neuro-oncologists is differentiating between radiation treatment effect and disease progression in the CNS. Both entities are characterized by an increase in contrast enhancement on MRI and present with similar clinical signs and symptoms that may occur either in close temporal proximity to the treatment or later in the disease course. When radiation-related imaging changes or clinical deterioration are mistaken for disease progression, patients may be subject to unnecessary surgery and/or a change from otherwise effective therapy. Similarly, when disease progression is mistaken for treatment effect, a potentially ineffective therapy may be continued in the face of progressive disease. Here we describe the three types of radiation injury to the brain based on the time to development of signs and symptoms - acute, subacute and late - and then review specific imaging changes after intensity-modulated radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery and brachytherapy. We provide an overview of these phenomena in the treatment of a wide range of malignant and benign CNS illnesses. Finally, we review the published data regarding imaging techniques under investigation to address this well-known problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available