4.4 Article

The significance of p53 isoform expression in serous ovarian cancer

Journal

FUTURE ONCOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 683-686

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/FON.12.60

Keywords

biomarker; ovarian cancer; p53 isoforms; p73; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [RO1 CA129688, P30 CA023074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evaluation of: Hofstetter G, Berger A, Schuster E et al. Delta 133p53 is an independent prognostic marker in p53 mutant advanced serous ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer 105(10), 1593-1599 (2011). Epithelial ovarian cancer still carries a high mortality rate and remains the leading cause of gynecologic cancer death in the USA, despite decades of research. Hence, there is considerable interest in developing biomarkers that could be used to stratify patients for subsequent treatment. Mutation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene occurs very frequently (similar to 96%) in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. However, loss of p53 has not proven to be a reliable prognostic marker. Recent evidence indicates that the truncated p53 protein isoforms can regulate activated p53 and thus may play a role in tumorigenesis. In the article by Hofstetter et al., the authors examined the relationship between the expression of two p53 isoforms (Delta 133p53 and Delta 40p53) and prognosis in patients with serous ovarian cancer. Their findings indicate that Delta 33p53 constitutes an independent prognostic marker for improved recurrence-free and overall survival. Intriguingly, this relationship was observed in patients whose tumors expressed a mutant p53, suggesting that Delta 133p53 might suppress the actions of mutant p53. The mutational status of p53 alone did not have prognostic significance. These studies suggest that mutant p53 activity may be counteracted by Delta 133p53, which leads to a more favorable prognosis in advanced serous ovarian carcinomas. Novel therapeutic approaches could be built upon these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available