4.4 Review

Dendritic cell-based therapeutic cancer vaccines: what we have and what we need

Journal

FUTURE ONCOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 379-390

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/FON.09.6

Keywords

breast cancer; cancer; clinical trials; colorectal cancer; CTL; dendritic cells; immunotherapy; melanoma; NK cells; ovarian cancer; prostate cancer; signal 3; signal 4; Th1; vaccines

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [CA095128, CA 114931, CA 101944, EA 055944]
  2. [CA137214]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Therapeutic cancer vaccines rely on the immune system to eliminate tumor cells. In contrast to chemotherapy or passive (adoptive) immunotherapies with antibodies or ex vivo-expanded T cells, therapeutic vaccines do not have a direct anti-tumor activity, but aim to reset patients' immune systems to achieve this goal. Recent identification of effective ways of enhancing immunogenicity of tumor-associated antigens, including the use of dendritic cells and other potent vectors of cancer vaccines, provide effective tools to induce high numbers of circulating tumor-specific T cells. However, despite indications that some of the new cancer vaccines may be able to delay tumor recurrence or prolong the survival of cancer patients, their ability to induce cancer regression remains low. Recent reports help to identify and prospectively remove the remaining obstacles towards effective therapeutic vaccination of cancer patients, They indicate that the successful induction of tumor-specific T cells by cancer vaccines is not necessarily associated with the induction of functional cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and that current cancer vaccines may promote undesirable expansion of Treg cells. Furthermore, recent studies also identify the tools to counteract such phenomena, in order to assure the desirable induction of Th1-cytotoxic T lymphocytes, NK-mediated type-1 immunity and appropriate homing of effector cells to tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available