4.7 Article

Scientific workflow design for mere mortals

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2008.06.013

Keywords

Workflow; Collection; COMAD; Resilience; Desiderata; Provenance; Automatic optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in research and development of scientific workflow systems. These systems promise to make scientists more productive by automating data-driven and compute-intensive analyses. Despite many early achievements, the long-term success of scientific workflow technology critically depends on making these systems useable by mere mortals, i.e., scientists who have a very good idea of the analysis methods they wish to assemble, but who are neither software developers nor scripting-language experts. With these users in mind, we identify a set of desiderata for scientific workflow systems crucial for enabling scientists to model and design the workflows they wish to automate themselves. As a first step towards meeting these requirements, we also show how the collection-oriented modeling and design (COMAD) approach for scientific workflows, implemented within the Kepler system, can help provide these critical, design-oriented capabilities to scientists. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available