4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

RETENTION AND SURFACE PORE FORMATION IN HELIUM IMPLANTED TUNGSTEN AS A FUSION FIRST WALL MATERIAL

Journal

FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 352-360

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.13182/FST09-A8927

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single- and polycrystalline tungsten samples were implanted with 30 keV He-3 ions to fluences of 5e16, 4e17 and 5e18 He/cm(2) at temperatures ranging from similar to 850 - 1000 degrees C. After implantation tungsten's retention characteristics were studied using He-3(d,p)He-4 nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) and He-3(n,p)T neutron depth profiling (NDP). Morphological analyses included scanning electron microscopy (SEM), focused ion beam (FIB) milling, and X-ray diffraction on the single crystalline W samples (XRD). SEM analysis showed that the threshold forsurface pore formation occurs in both single-crystalline tungsten (SCW) and polycrystalline tungsten (PCW) between similar to 5e16 - 4e17 He+/cm(2). Both surface and sub-surface pore formation is observed to increase with higher implant fluences. Focused ion beam (FIB) milling revealed a sub-surface porous layer in both SCW and PCW which increased in depth with implanted fluences. NRA measured the retained He fluence in SCW between 1.1e16 - 1.1e17 He/cm(2) and in PCW between 1.3e71 - 1.5e17 He/cm(2). NDP analysis measured the retained He fluence in SCW between 2.0e16 - 2.7e.17 He/cm(2) and in PCW between 4.1e16 - 3.2e17 He/cm(2). Both of these analysis techniques reveal that the retained helium saturates in both single and polycrystalline W at similar to 4e17 cm(-2). The NDP analysis showed that the peak helium concentration shifted deeper into the specimens as the dose was increased indicating a decrease in the effective density of the surface layer with an increased dose. Average retained helium concentrations were found to range from 0.7 - 8.6 at% in SCW and from 1.3 - 11.4 at% in PCW.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available