4.4 Review

Consequences of reproductive mode on genome evolution in fungi

Journal

FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 7, Pages 661-667

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.02.005

Keywords

Genome evolution; Mating systems; Mutations; Dead end theory; Neurospora

Funding

  1. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  2. Royal Physiographic Society in Lund
  3. Lars Hierta Minne Foundation
  4. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  5. Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An organism's reproductive mode is believed to be a major factor driving its genome evolution. In theory, sexual inbreeding and asexuality are associated with lower effective recombination levels and smaller effective population sizes than sexual outbreeding, giving rise to reduced selection efficiency and genetic hitchhiking. This, in turn, is predicted to result in the accumulation of deleterious mutations and other genomic changes, for example the accumulation of repetitive elements. Empirical data from plants and animals supporting/refuting these theories are sparse and have yielded few conclusive results. A growing body of data from the fungal kingdom, wherein reproductive behavior varies extensively within and among taxonomic groups, has provided new insights into the role of mating systems (e.g., homothallism, heterothallism, pseudohomothallism) and asexuality, on genome evolution. Herein, we briefly review the theoretical relationships between reproductive mode and genome evolution and give examples of empirical data on the topic derived to date from plants and animals. We subsequently focus on the available data from fungi, which suggest that reproductive mode alters the rates and patterns of genome evolution in these organisms, e.g., protein evolution, mutation rate, codon usage, frequency of genome rearrangements and repetitive elements, and variation in chromosome size. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available