4.4 Article

Population structure of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus and its genetic relationship to Hymenoscyphus albidus

Journal

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 147-153

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2011.10.004

Keywords

AP-PCR; Ash dieback; Emerging fungal pathogen; Fraxinus excelsior; Genetic variation; Gene flow; Microsatellites; Vegetative incompatibility

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS)
  2. Nordic Forest Cooperation Committee (SNS) [SNS-109]
  3. Carl Tryggers Stiftelse for Vetenskaplig Forskning [CTS 06: 478]
  4. BMLFUW ('Lebensministerium')
  5. provincial governments of Lower Austria, Carinthia, Upper Austria, Salzburg, Burgenland, Styria
  6. Vienna City Administration
  7. [013f]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ascomycete fungus Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus (anamorph Chalara fraxinea) is responsible for ash dieback currently expanding over large parts of Europe. Our objective was to investigate the genetic structure of H. pseudoalbidus and to examine its relationship to the species H. albidus, known as a saprotroph. The study comprised 181 isolates of H. pseudoalbidus collected within the diseased area, 17 H. albidus isolates from six apothecia, collected outside the diseased area in Norway, and nine apothecia of H. pseudoalbidus collected in Sweden. By analysis of microsatellite markers developed for this study, combined with AP-PCR using the M13 primer, we demonstrated sexual heterothally in H. pseudoalbidus, detected high gene flow and low geographic structure of the H. pseudoalbidus population and found indications of a founder effect. Also, substantial genetic differences were detected between the two species of fungi; only four of seven microsatellite markers developed for H. pseudoalbidus were amplified for H. albidus, and no alleles were shared among the species. Furthermore, AP-PCR banding patterns were distinctly different for the two species. We conclude that even though the two fungi have a similar habitat and are morphologically virtually identical, they do not share a recent common ancestor. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available