4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Impacts of changing climate and agronomic factors on fusarium ear blight of wheat in the UK

Journal

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 53-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2011.03.003

Keywords

Deoxynivalenol (DON); Food security; Fusarium head blight; Mycotoxins; Risk prediction; Wheat scab

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004693, BB/I017585/2, BB/I017585/1, BB/D015200/1, BB/E001610/1, BBS/E/C/00004972, BBS/B/12261, BBS/E/C/00004755] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. BBSRC [BB/D015200/1, BBS/E/C/00004972, BB/I017585/1, BB/I017585/2, BB/E001610/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate change will have direct impacts on fusarium ear blight (FEB) in wheat crops, since weather factors greatly affect epidemics, the relative proportions of species of ear blight pathogens responsible and the production of deoxynivalenol (DON) toxin by two Fusarium species, F. graminearum and F. culmorum. Many established weather-based prediction models do not accurately predict FEB severity in the UK. One weather-based model developed with UK data suggests a slight increase in FEB severity as a direct effect of climate change. However, severity of the disease is likely to increase further due to indirect effects of climate change, such as increased cropping of grain maize, since maize debris is a potent source of inoculum of F. graminearum. To guide strategies for adaptation to climate change, further research on forecasting, management options to reduce mycotoxin production, and breeding for resistant varieties is a high priority for the UK. Adaptation strategies must also consider factors such as tillage regime, wheat cultivar (flowering time and disease resistance) and fungicide use, which also influence the severity of FEB and related toxin production. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available