4.4 Review

Microbial responses to a changing environment: implications for the future functioning of terrestrial ecosystems

Journal

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 386-395

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2011.04.001

Keywords

Actinobacteria; Ascomycetes; Basidiomycetes; Biogeochemistry; Climate change; Extracellular enzymes; Fungi; Gene transcription; Litter decay; Nitrogen deposition; Soil organic matter storage

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [0814623] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review, we present a conceptual model which links plant communities and saprotrophic microbial communities through the reciprocal exchange of growth-limiting resources. We discuss the numerous ways human-induced environmental change has directly and indirectly impacted this relationship, and review microbial responses that have occurred to date. We argue that compositional shifts in saprotrophic microbial communities underlie functional responses to environmental change that have ecosystem-level implications. Drawing on a long-term, large-scale, field experiment, we illustrate how and why chronic atmospheric N deposition can alter saprotrophic communities in the soil of a wide-spread sugar maple (Acer saccharum) ecosystem in northeastern North America, resulting in the slowing of plant litter decay, the rapid accumulation of soil organic matter, and the accelerated production and loss of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Compositional shifts in soil microbial communities, mediated by ecological interactions among soil saprotrophs, appear to lie at the biogeochemical heart of ecosystem response to environmental change. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available