4.3 Article

Superoxide radical is involved in the sclerotial differentiation of filamentous phytopathogenic fungi: identification of a fungal xanthine oxidase

Journal

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue 5-6, Pages 387-395

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.01.010

Keywords

Oxidative stress; Superoxide dismutase; Xanthine oxidase

Categories

Funding

  1. European Social Fund (ESF)
  2. Operational Program for Educational and Vocational Training II (EPEAEK II)
  3. Program IRAKLEITOS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study shows that the direct indicator of oxidative stress superoxide radical (O-2(center dot-)) is involved in the sclerotial differentiation of the phytopathogenic filamentous fungi Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Sclerotinia minor. The production rate of O-2(center dot-) and the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels in the sclerotiogenic fungi were significantly higher and lower, respectively, than those of their non-differentiating counterpart strains, which strongly suggests that the oxidative stress of the sclerotium differentiating fungi is higher than that of the non-differentiating ones. Xanthine oxidase (XO), which was detected for the first time in fungi in general, was localized in the cytoplasmic membrane. The contribution of XO in the overall O-2(center dot-) production was very significant, reaching 30-70% among the strains, especially in the transition developmental stage between the undifferentiated and the differentiated state, suggesting a sclerotium triggering and a phytopathogenic role of XO during plant infection. The additional finding that these fungi secrete extracellular SOD can be related to their protection from the response of plants to produce O-2(center dot-) at infection sites. (C) 2010 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available