4.5 Article

Phenotyping of wheat cultivars for heat tolerance using chlorophyll a fluorescence

Journal

FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 10-11, Pages 936-947

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/FP12100

Keywords

genetic determination; photosynthesis; screening; selection; stress; temperature

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Denmark [3304-FVFP-09-B-008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In view of the global climate change, heat stress is an increasing constraint for the productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Our aim was to identify contrasting cultivars in terms of heat tolerance by mass screening of 1274 wheat cultivars of diverse origin, based on a physiological trait, the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (F-v/F-m). A chlorophyll fluorescence protocol was standardised and used for repeated screening with increased selection pressure with a view to identifying a set of cultivars extreme for the trait. An initial mass screening of 1274 wheat cultivars with a milder heat stress of 38 degrees C in 300 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) for 2 h with preheating at 33-35 degrees C for 19 h in 7-14 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) light showed a genetic determination of 8.5 +/- 2.7%. Aheat treatment of 40 degrees C in 300 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) for 72 h in the second screening with 138 selected cultivars resulted in larger differentiation of cultivars with an increased genetic component (15.4 +/- 3.6%), which was further increased to 27.9 +/- 6.8% in the third screening with 41 contrasting cultivars. This contrasting set of cultivars was then used to compare the ability of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters to detect genetic difference in heat tolerance. The identification of a set of wheat cultivars contrasting for their inherent photochemical efficiency may aid future studies to understand the genetic and physiological nature of heat stress tolerance in order to dissect quantitative traits into simpler genetic factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available