4.5 Article

Linking canopy temperature and trunk diameter fluctuations with other physiological water status tools for water stress management in citrus orchards

Journal

FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 106-117

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/FP10202

Keywords

deficit irrigation; dendrometry; infrared thermometry; maximum daily shrinkage; stem water potential; stomatal conductance

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union [RTA2008-00058-CO3-03]
  2. INIA [PRE-2007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The continuous monitoring of crop water status is key to the sustainable management of water stress situations. Two deficit irrigation (DI) treatments were studied during the maximum evapotranspirative demand period in an orange orchard (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb. cv. Navelina): sustained deficit irrigation irrigated at 55% crop evapotranspiration (ETC), and low-frequency deficit irrigation treatment, in which the plants were irrigated according to stem water potential at midday (Psi(stem)). Additionally, a control treatment irrigated at 100% of ETC was established. The daily canopy temperature (T-C) was measured with an infrared thermometer camera together with measurements of trunk diameter fluctuations (TDF), Psi(stem) and stomatal conductance (g(S)). The time course of all physiological parameters and their relationships were analysed, confirming that canopy air temperature differential (T-C-T-a) variations and TDF are suitable approaches for determining the water stress. In addition, the maximum daily shrinkage (MDS) and T-C-T-a showed high sensitivity to water stress in comparison to Psi(stem) and gS. Significant relationships were found among MDS and T-C-T-a with Psi(stem) and g(S), for monitoring the crop water status by means of MDS vs Psi(stem) and T-C-T-a vs Psi(stem). Thus, the combination of these techniques would be useful for making scheduling decisions on irrigation in orchards with high variability in plant water stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available