4.5 Article

High night temperature decreases leaf photosynthesis and pollen function in grain sorghum

Journal

FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 12, Pages 993-1003

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/FP11035

Keywords

heat stress; high temperature; phospholipid; seed-set

Categories

Funding

  1. Kansas Grain Sorghum Commission
  2. K-State Center for Sorghum Improvement
  3. US Aid for International Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High temperature stress is an important abiotic stress limiting sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) yield in arid and semiarid regions. Climate models project greater increases in the magnitude of night temperature compared with day temperature. We hypothesise that high night temperature (HNT) during flowering will cause oxidative damage in leaves and pollen grains, leading to decreased photosynthesis and seed-set, respectively. The objectives of this research were to determine effects of HNT on (1) photochemical efficiency and photosynthesis of leaves, and (2) pollen functions and seed-set. Sorghum plants (hybrid DK-28E) were exposed to optimum night temperature (ONT; 32 : 22 degrees C, day maximum : night minimum) or HNT (32 : 28 degrees C, day maximum : night minimum) for 10 days after complete panicle emergence. Exposure to HNT increased thylakoid membrane damage and non-photochemical quenching. However, HNT decreased chlorophyll content, quantum yield of PSII, photochemical quenching, electron transport rate and photosynthesis of leaves as compared with ONT. Exposure to HNT increased the reactive oxygen species (ROS) level of leaves and pollen grains. Lipid molecular species analyses in pollen grains showed that HNT decreased phospholipid saturation levels and altered various phospholipid levels compared with ONT. These changes in phospholipids and greater ROS in pollen grains may be responsible for decreased pollen function, leading to lower seed-set.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available