4.7 Article

Seasonal bryophyte productivity in the sub-Arctic: a comparison with vascular plants

Journal

FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 365-378

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01954.x

Keywords

carbon; CO2 flux; gross primary productivity; moss; photosynthesis; tundra; snow melt

Categories

Funding

  1. NERC [University of Edinburgh and University of Sheffield] [NE/D005884/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H000437/1, NE/D005884/1, NE/D005795/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/H000437/1, NE/D005884/1, NE/D005795/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1. Arctic ecosystems are experiencing rapid climate change, which could result in positive feedbacks on climate warming if ecosystem carbon (C) loss exceeds C uptake through plant growth. Bryophytes (mosses, liverworts and hornworts) are important components of Arctic vegetation, but are currently not well represented in terrestrial C models; in particular, seasonal patterns in bryophyte C metabolism compared to vascular plant vegetation are poorly understood. 2. Our objective was to quantify land-surface CO2 fluxes for common sub-Arctic bryophyte patches (dominated by Polytrichum piliferum and Sphagnum fuscum) in spring (March-May) and during the summer growing season (June-August) and to develop a simple model of bryophyte gross primary productivity fluxes (PB). We use the model to explore the key environmental controls over PB for P. piliferum and S. fuscum and compare seasonal patterns of productivity with those of typical vascular plant communities at the same site. 3. The modelled total gross primary productivity (RPB) over 1 year (March-November) for P. piliferum was c. 360 g C m) 2 ground and for S. fuscum c. 112 g C m) 2 ground, c. 90% and 30% of total gross primary productivity for typical vascular plant communities (RPV) over the same year. In spring (March-May), when vascular plant leaves are not fully developed, RPB for P. piliferum was 3 u RPV. 4. Model sensitivity analysis indicated that bryophyte turf water content does not significantly affect (March-November) RPB for P. piliferum and S. fuscum, at least for periods without sustained lack of precipitation. However, we find that seasonal changes in bryophyte photosynthetic capacity are important in determining RPB for both bryophyte species. 5. Our study implies that models of C dynamics in the Arctic must include a bryophyte component if they are intended to predict the effects of changes in the timing of the growing season, or of changes in vegetation composition, on Arctic C balance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available