4.5 Article

Auxin-related gene families in abiotic stress response in Sorghum bicolor

Journal

FUNCTIONAL & INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 533-546

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10142-010-0174-3

Keywords

Abiotic stress; Aux/IAA; ARF; GH3; LBD; Sorghum bicolor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30770213, 30971743]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2007AA10Z188, 2007AA10Z191, 2008AA10Z125]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province, China [Y3080111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sorghum, a C4 model plant, has been studied to develop an understanding of the molecular mechanism of resistance to stress. The auxin-response genes, auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (Aux/IAA), auxin-response factor (ARF), Gretchen Hagen3 (GH3), small auxin-up RNAs, and lateral organ boundaries (LBD), are involved in growth/development and stress/defense responses in Arabidopsis and rice, but they have not been studied in sorghum. In the present paper, the chromosome distribution, gene duplication, promoters, intron/exon, and phylogenic relationships of Aux/IAA, ARF, GH3, and LBD genes in sorghum are presented. Furthermore, real-time PCR analysis demonstrated these genes are differently expressed in leaf/root of sorghum and indicated the expression profile of these gene families under IAA, brassinosteroid (BR), salt, and drought treatments. The SbGH3 and SbLBD genes, expressed in low level under natural condition, were highly induced by salt and drought stress consistent with their products being involved in both abiotic stresses. Three genes, SbIAA1 SbGH3-13, and SbLBD32, were highly induced under all the four treatments, IAA, BR, salt, and drought. The analysis provided new evidence for role of auxin in stress response, implied there are cross talk between auxin, BR and abiotic stress signaling pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available