4.5 Article

Non-climacteric fruit ripening in pepper: increased transcription of EIL-like genes normally regulated by ethylene

Journal

FUNCTIONAL & INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 135-146

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10142-009-0136-9

Keywords

Microarray; Fruit development; Climacteric ripening; Non-climacteric ripening; Comparative transcriptome analysis; Heterologous array hybridization

Funding

  1. PDRC [PF0033-01]
  2. CFGC [CG1431]
  3. MOST of the Korean government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Only limited information has been published to date on the similarities and differences between climacteric and non-climacteric fruit ripening on transcriptional level. To address this issue, we performed a direct comparative transcriptome analysis between tomato and pepper fruits using heterologous microarray hybridization. Given the significant differences in the morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of pepper and tomato fruits, the existence of extensive common regulons is surprising. This finding suggests the conservation of ripening mechanisms in climacteric and non-climacteric fruits. However, disparate expression profiles were also observed in both fruits. This study revealed that a gene that encodes an enzyme that converts lycopene to downstream carotenoids is induced in pepper but not in tomato. Most of the genes that encode ribosomal proteins are only induced in early fruit-stage pepper fruit and show rapidly diminishing expression in the later developmental stages. The genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis were not induced in pepper fruit. However, the EIL-like genes, ethylene-mediated signaling components, were induced in pepper fruit. Divergent types of transcription factors were expressed in ripening tomato and pepper fruits, suggesting they may be key factors that differentiate these distinct ripening processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available