4.7 Article

The performance of solid phosphoric acid catalysts and macroporous sulfonic resins on gasoline alkylation desulfurization

Journal

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue 11, Pages 1731-1735

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.07.012

Keywords

Gasoline; Alkylation desulfurization; Solid phosphoric acid; Macroporous sulfonic resin; Amberlyst 35

Funding

  1. China's National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) [2008RD017]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20976129]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sulfur removal has received increasing attention in recent years primarily for environmental protection purpose. As an attractive technology in the case of gasoline, OATS (olefinic alkylation of thiophenic sulfur) proposed to separate sulfur compounds by distillation after being weighed down by alkylation with olefins in the feed. In this paper, alkylation reactions of thiophenic compounds were studied over solid phosphoric acid catalysts (SPAM and SPAS using MCM-41 and Silicalite-1 zeolite as supporters respectively) and macroporous sulfonic resins (including NKC-9, D005-2 and Amberlyst 35) with model gasoline and FCC (fluid catalytic cracking) gasoline. Results showed that macroporous sulfonic resins showed better performance than solid phosphoric acid catalysts under milder conditions in both feeds. Among the resins, Amberlyst 35 was the most suitable catalyst for the application of catalytic distillation for its good performance at the temperature range of 353-413 K in FCC gasoline. However, the selectivity of isoamylene dimerization over Amberlyst 35 decreased with the temperature, which was harmful to the product yield and catalyst stability. Besides, different activity orders of solid phosphoric acid catalysts in model gasoline and FCC gasoline were explained by combining the acidic properties of the catalysts with the species of olefins in two feeds. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available