4.4 Article

Preparation and Characterisation of Proton Exchange Membranes Based on Crosslinked Polybenzimidazole and Phosphoric Acid

Journal

FUEL CELLS
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 973-982

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/fuce.201000071

Keywords

Crosslinking; N-vinylimidazole; Polybenzimidazole; Proton Conductivity; Vinylbenzyl Chloride

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [50773055]
  2. International Cooperation Foundation for Science & Technology of Shanghai [065207064]
  3. Foundation for Nano Science & Technology of Shanghai [0852 nm 02200]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-06-0379]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crosslinked polybenzimidazole (PBI) was synthesised via free radical polymerisation between N-vinylimidazole and vinylbenzyl substituted PBI. The degree of crosslinking increases with increasing content of the crosslinker. The phosphoric acid doping behaviour, mechanical properties, proton conductivity and acid migration stability of crosslinked PBI and linear PBI are discussed. The results show that the acid doping ability decreases with increasing degree of crosslinking of PBI. The introduction of N-vinylimidazole in PBI is beneficial to its oxidation stability. The mechanical stability of crosslinked PBI/H3PO4 membrane is better than that of linear PBI/H3PO4 membrane. The proton conductivity of the acid doped membranes can reach similar to 10(-4) S cm(-1) for crosslinked PBI/H3PO4 composite membranes at 150 degrees C. The temperature dependence of proton conductivity of the acid doped membranes can be modelled by an Arrhenius relation. The proton conductivity of crosslinked PBI/H3PO4 composite membranes is a little lower than that of linear PBI/H3PO4 membranes with the same acid content. However, the migration stability of H3PO4 in crosslinked PBI/H3PO4 membranes is improved compared with that of linear PBI/H3PO4 membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available