Integrating physicochemical information to follow the transformations of biomass upon torrefaction and low-temperature carbonization

Morphological and structural changes of different types of biomass after torrefaction and low-temperature carbonization processes have been investigated using a variety of characterization techniques comprising Fourier-Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), gas adsorption at different pressures, thermogravimetry, optical and scanning electron microscopy techniques together with chemical analysis. The biomasses selected included softwood chips (pine), hardwood chips (acacia, eucalyptus, forest residues from eucalyptus) and olive stone. Torrefaction led to the enrichment of carbon and a decrease in reactivity, accompanied by a decrease in the hydrogen-and oxygen-bearing functionalities and a slight increase in aromatization. This was physically reflected in cell-wall shrinkage, resulting in a brittle, well-defined vegetal structure with moderate microporosity, in which slight increase in cell-wall reflectance and significant decrease in fluorescence have been produced. Carbonization at 450 degrees C in turn led to a further loss of oxygen functionalities and a large increase in aromaticity, reflecting the virtual disappearance of hemicellulose and cellulose. This caused a significant increase in optical reflectance, loss of fluorescence and development of both meso-and microporosity generating an isotropic solid with a disordered structure similar to that of industrial charcoal. The microscopy techniques also showed the heterogeneity of the treated samples in terms of reflectance distribution or fluorescence properties, which cannot be assessed by bulk characterization techniques. They indicated a greater heterogeneity in the sample treated at torrefaction temperatures. The different characterization techniques have revealed minor differences between hardwood and softwood behavior, essentially attributed to resinous impregnations in the latter, whereas greater differences were observed between woods and olive stone due to significant differences in their internal and external structure. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.