4.7 Article

Gold supported on CuOx/CeO2 catalyst for the purification of hydrogen by the CO preferential oxidation reaction (PROX)

Journal

FUEL
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages 176-185

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.072

Keywords

Gold catalyst; Copper-cerium oxide; Hydrogen; PROX; CO oxidation

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [ENE2009-14522-C05]
  2. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [ENE2012-37431-C03-03]
  3. FEDER funds from the European Union
  4. Junta de Andalucia [P09-TEP-5454]
  5. Ministry for the FPI fellowship [BES-2007-14409]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogen produced from the conversion of hydrocarbons or alcohols contains variable amounts of CO that should be removed for some applications such as feeding low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). The CO preferential oxidation reaction (PROX) is particularly well-suited for hydrogen purification for portable and on-board applications. In this work, the synthesis and characterization by XRF, BET, XRD, Raman spectroscopy and H-2-TPR of a gold catalyst supported on a copper-cerium mixed oxide (AuCeCu) for the PROX reaction are presented. The comparison of this catalyst with the copper-cerium mixed oxide (CeCu) revealed that the experimental procedure used for the deposition of gold gave rise to the loss of reducible material by copper lixiviation. However, the AuCeCu solid was more active for CO oxidation at low temperature. A kinetic study has been carried over the AuCeCu catalyst for the PROX reaction and compared with that of the CeCu catalyst. The main difference between the models affected the contribution of the CO adsorption term. This fact may be related to the surface electronic activity produced by the interaction of the cationic species in the AuCeCu solid, able to create more active sites for the CO adsorption and activation in the presence of gold. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available