4.1 Article

Aromatase knockout mice reveal an impact of estrogen on drug-induced alternation of murine electrocardiography parameters

Journal

JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 339-348

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.2131/jts.40.339

Keywords

Estrogen; hERG channel; Cardiac electrophysiology; Cardiac toxicology; ECG

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, Sports and Technology of Japan [23136703, 25461045, 23390205, 25670126, 15H04684, 23390053]
  2. Restart Postdoctoral Fellowship from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. program of Activation of Gender Equity/Gender Medicine and Enrichment of Life of Tokyo Medical and Dental University
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26293052, 25670126, 15H04684, 25461045, 25461398, 15K15049, 14J40079, 23390205, 23390053] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our in vitro characterization showed that physiological concentrations of estrogen partially suppressed the I-Kr channel current in guinea pig ventricular myocytes and the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) channel currents in CHO-K1 cells regardless of estrogen receptor signaling and revealed that the partially suppressed hERG currents enhanced the sensitivity to the hERG blocker E-4031. To obtain in vivo proof-of-concept data to support the effects of estrogen on cardiac electrophysiology, we here employed an aromatase knockout mouse as an in vivo estrogen-null model and compared the acute effects of E-4031 on cardiac electrophysiological parameters with those in wild-type mice (C57/BL6J) by recording surface electrocardiogram (ECG). The ablation of circulating estrogens blunted the effects of E-4031 on heart rate and QT interval in mice under a denervation condition. Our result provides in vivo proof of principle and demonstrates that endogenous estrogens increase the sensitivity of E-4031 to cardiac electrophysiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available