4.7 Article

Laminar flame speeds of transportation-relevant hydrocarbons and jet fuels at elevated temperatures and pressures

Journal

FUEL
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages 191-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.084

Keywords

Laminar flame speed; Liquid hydrocarbons; Jet fuels; Elevated pressures

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research Multi University Research Initiative [FA9550-07-1-0515]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laminar flame speeds of several fuel/air mixtures were experimentally determined over equivalence ratios of phi = 0.7-1.3, preheat temperatures of T-u = 350-470 K, and pressures of P = 1-3 atm in a high-pressure counterflow setup. Fuels investigated in this work included neat components relevant to liquid transportation fuels, such as n-decane, n-dodecane, iso-octane, toluene, n-propylbenzene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, a conventional Jet-A labeled as POSF 4658, an alternative jet fuel, S-8, labeled as POSF 4734, and a four-component Jet-A surrogate composed of n-dodecane, iso-octane, n-propylbenzene, and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene. The experimental results were also compared with computed values obtained by using various published kinetic models for different fuels. Ingeneral, the simulated results are in fair agreement with the experimental data, considering the uncertainties in both experiments and kinetic models. Further analysis on experimental data was conducted to assess the effects of preheat temperature on laminar flame speed and pressure on mass burning flux. From the variation of mass burning flux with pressure, the overall reaction orders of various fuels were extracted. The present flame propagation data at elevated pressures for large hydrocarbons can be used in surrogate formulation and mechanism validation for liquid transportation fuels. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available