Journal
FUEL
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 415-422Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.036
Keywords
Hydrotreating; Electrocatalysis; Hydrogenation; Sulfide catalysts
Categories
Funding
- Centre for Oil Sands Innovation at the University of Alberta
- NSERC
- Canada Research Chair
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In order to assess the potential application of electrocatalytic hydrogenation to petroleum fractions, as an alternative to high-pressure hydrotreating, we studied the conversion of a series of model compounds. Naphthalene, 1-methyl naphthalene, quinoline, carbazole, and dibenzothiophene were reacted in a flow cell over sulfur-resistant tungsten disulfide/glassy carbon electrodes. Raney nickel was used as a reference catalytic electrode material. The reactants were dissolved in a solution of ionic liquid and water, to provide high solubility of reactant, high conductivity, and protons for electrochemical hydrogenation. Both quinoline and carbazole were hydrogenated on WS2/glassy carbon cathodes in the presence of thiophene, but the initial current efficiencies were less than 10%. Conversion of naphthalene was detected, but the initial current efficiency was only 1.8%. Conversion of 1-methyl naphthalene and dibenzothiophene was not detected over this electrode material. Raney nickel gave higher conversion rates and current efficiencies for quinoline, carbazole, and naphthalene, but only traces of product from 1-methylnaphthalene were detected. These results indicate that current efficiency and sustained conversion rates for alkylaromatics and heteroaromatics must be improved considerably in order for electrocatalytic hydrogenation to compete with conventional hydrotreating. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available