4.7 Article

Activity and stability of a novel Ru modified Ni catalyst for hydrogen generation by supercritical water gasification of glucose

Journal

FUEL
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 541-545

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.066

Keywords

Supercritical water gasification (SCWG); Hydrogen generation; Nickel catalysts; Ruthenium modifier; Stability

Funding

  1. Ontario Ministry of Energy
  2. Ontario Centers of Excellence (OCE) through the Atikokan Bioenergy Research Center (ABRC)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Ontario Ministry of Research Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The activities and stabilities of gamma-Al2O3 supported Ni catalysts (Ni10/gamma-Al2O3 and Ru(0.1)Ni10/gamma-Al2O3) for hydrogen generation through the supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of glucose were investigated at 700 degrees C, 24 MPa and a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of 6 h (1) in a bench-scale continuous down-flow tubular reactor. The Ru0.1Ni10/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst (10 wt.% Ni, the Ru-to-Ni molar ratio of 0.1) exhibited higher activity and stability than Ni10/gamma-Al2O3 (10 wt.% Ni). With the Ru(0.1)Ni10/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst, negligible catalyst deactivation was observed over a period of 33 h on stream. The H-2 yield was maintained as high as similar to 50 mol/kg glucose throughout the entire stability test. In contrast, the activity of Ni10/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst (10 wt.% Ni) decreased after approximately 7 h on stream, accompanied by a marked decrease in the H-2 yield from similar to 50 mol/kg glucose initially to similar to 25 mol/kg glucose after 7 h. The temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) and H-2 chemisorption analyses on the fresh catalysts demonstrated that the addition of a small amount of Ru as a modifier could improve Ni dispersion, which could account for the enhanced activity and higher stability of the Ru(0.1)Ni10/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available