4.7 Article

Investigation of temperature effect on permeability of naturally fractured black coal for carbon dioxide movement: An experimental and numerical study

Journal

FUEL
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages 596-605

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.026

Keywords

Fractured black coal; Permeability; Temperature; Triaxial test; Numerical model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Very deep coal seams which are unlikely to be mined may be considered for CO2 sequestration. The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of temperature on the permeability of naturally fractured coal. Permeability tests were conducted on naturally fractured bituminous coal samples using high pressure triaxial equipment for five different injecting pressures (8-13 MPa) under two different confinements (20 and 24 MPa) and five different temperatures (25-70 degrees C). The experimental data were then used to develop an appropriate numerical model using the COMET 3 simulator to model the temperature effect on permeability at temperatures up to 200 degrees C. According to the measured permeability values and the developed lab-scale model, there is a clear increase in CO2 permeability with increasing temperature for any confining pressure at high injecting pressures (more then 10 MPa). However, for low injecting pressures (less than 9 MPa) temperature effect is not so much. With increasing injecting pressure, CO2 permeability decreases at low temperatures (less than around 40 degrees C), and increases at high temperatures (more than 50 degrees C). Interestingly, the temperature effect on permeability is significant only up to around 90 degrees C condition within the 25-200 degrees C temperature limit. These observations are related with the sorption behavior of the adsorbing CO2 during the injection. However, there is no noticeable temperature effect on N-2 permeability as it does not create any swelling effect in coal matrix. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available