Journal
FUEL
Volume 89, Issue 12, Pages 3735-3741Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.022
Keywords
Biofuel; Combustion; Spray; Emission; Drops
Categories
Funding
- Oklahoma Bioenergy Center
- US Department of Education
- EPSCoR
- Office Of The Director [0814361] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The spray atomization and combustion characteristics of canola methyl ester (CME) biofuel are compared to those of petroleum based No. 2 diesel fuel in this paper. The spray flame was contained in an optically accessible combustor which was operated at atmospheric pressure with a co-flow of heated air. Fuel was delivered through a swirl-type air-blast atomizer with an injector orifice diameter of 300 mu m. A two-component phase Doppler particle analyzer was used to measure the spray droplet size, axial velocity, and radial velocity distributions. Radial and axial distributions of NO, CO, CO(2) and O(2) concentrations were also obtained. Axial and radial distributions of flame temperature were recorded with a Pt-Pt/13%Rh (type R) thermocouple. The volumetric flow rates of fuel, atomization air and co-flow air were kept constant for both fuels. The droplet Sauter mean diameter (SMD) at the nozzle exit for CME biofuel spray was smaller than that of the No. 2 diesel fuel spray, implying faster vaporization rates for the former. The flame temperature decreased more rapidly for the CME biofuel spray flame than for the No. 2 diesel fuel spray flame in both axial and radial directions. CME biofuel spray flames produced lower in-flame NO and CO peak concentrations than No. 2 diesel fuel spray flames. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available